Future Wellness Group Menu
Evidence and standards

Every threshold names its instrument

We assess against published standards, not against a manufacturer's marketing sheet. Where a standard does not exist, we say so and describe the method instead.

The modality taxonomy, ten channelsThe diligence question sets
250 lx
Melanopic EDI at the eye, before 10:00
± 0.5 °C
Immersion setpoint stability under bather load
< 800 ppm
CO₂ at design occupancy
NR 25
Sleeping rooms at night
The reference set
DomainReferenceRead by
LightCIE S 026, and IEEE 1789 for temporal light modulationSpectroradiometer at the vertical plane of the eye
WaterPWTAG TN71 water management recordCalibrated immersion probe, logged under load
AirISO 16890, ePM1 at or above 80 per centBreathing zone sensor, occupied for 72 hours
AcousticsISO 16283-1 for airborne sound reductionField measurement between room and circulation
PhotobiomodulationNo settled standard. Method stated in fullOptical power meter at the working distance

A reading is taken where the body sits, not where the sensor was convenient.

Where a threshold cannot be measured, we remove it rather than soften it.

How a verdict is reached
01

Claim extraction

Every claim made by the supplier is written down as a parameter with a unit. Claims that cannot be written this way are recorded as unevidenced.

02

Literature position

The dose response in the peer-reviewed literature is separated from the dose the equipment actually delivers. The gap between the two is usually the finding.

03

Bench and in situ measurement

Measured at the distance and the load at which a body will use it, not at the manufacturer's stated test condition.

04

Verdict and review date

Green, amber or red, with the conditions attached to it and the date on which it will be tested again.

Applied to procurement, this becomes the diligence question sets: the questions a supplier answers in writing before we specify.